Kelda Roys' Issue Positions (Political Courage Test)
Office:
- State Senate (WI) - District 26, Democratic
Key
Official Position: Candidate addressed this issue directly by taking the Political Courage Test.
Inferred Position: Candidate refused to address this issue, but Vote Smart inferred this issue based on the candidate's public record, including statements, voting record, and special interest group endorsements.
Unknown Position: Candidate refused to address this issue, or we could not infer an answer for this candidate despite exhaustive research of their public record.
Additional Information: Click on this icon to reveal more information about this candidate's position, from their answers or Vote Smart's research.
Other or Expanded Principles & Legislative Priorities are entered exactly as candidates submit them. Vote Smart does not edit for misspelled words, punctuation or grammar.
Kelda Roys has failed to provide voters with positions on key issues covered by the 2020 Political Courage Test, despite repeated requests from Vote Smart and voters like you.
This candidate has responded to a Political Courage Test in a previous election. As a continued effort to provide the American public with factual information on candidates running for public office, these archived responses are made available here.
Wisconsin Congressional Election 2012 Political Courage Test
| Pro-choice | Do you generally support pro-choice or pro-life legislation? | ||
| As one of the nation's strongest pro-choice advocates, I will defend abortion rights and work to advance reproductive justice for all women and men. I served four years as Executive Director of NARAL Pro-Choice Wisconsin, advocating for women's rights across the state. We must continue to do everything we can to reduce the need for abortion, while ensuring that it remains safe, legal, and available for every woman who needs it. I also support expanding access to the full range of reproductive health care, including preventing unintended pregnancy and bearing healthy children. | |||
| No | Do you support United States' combat operations in Afghanistan? | ||
| Yes | Do you support a timetable for withdrawal from Afghanistan? | ||
| I support immediate withdrawal from Afghanistan. | |||
Indicate which proposals you support (if any) for balancing the federal budget.In order to balance the budget,
| Yes | do you support reducing defense spending? | ||
| Yes | do you support an income tax increase on any tax bracket? | ||
| No | do you support reducing Medicaid spending? | ||
| No | do you support reducing Medicare spending? | ||
| Yes | Is balancing the budget a legislative priority? | ||
| Focusing only on cutting the budget in a time of economic uncertainty is damaging for the middle class and will prolong our economic hurt. We must make smart cuts to our unnecessarily high defense and private contractor spending, but allow the Bush Tax Cuts to expire on those earning over $250,000 per year. Compromising vital economic security programs like Medicare and Social Security, and slashing funding for infrastructure and education, will lead to serious economic harm for millions of American families. Detailed information is available on my website, www.keldaforcongress.com/issues | |||
| Yes | Do you support the regulation of indirect campaign contributions from corporations and unions? | ||
| Given the dramatic flood of special interest money into our political system as a result of the Citizens United decision, I have chosen to take a tough stance and refuse all corporate PAC money for my campaign. This puts me at a fundraising disadvantage, but I believe that it is the right thing to do. I will not perpetuate this broken system - I will work to change it. We must move towards a system of full public financing for our elections, eliminating the opportunity for special interests to buy influence from our representatives. | |||
| No | Do you support capital punishment for certain crimes? | ||
| As an attorney who worked on the Innocence Project, the death penalty should never be used by our imperfect, human justice system. | |||
| Yes | Do you support federal spending as a means of promoting economic growth? | ||
| Yes | Do you support providing tax incentives to businesses for the purpose of job creation? | ||
| Yes | Do you support spending on infrastructure projects for the purpose of job creation? | ||
| Yes | Do you support the temporary extension of unemployment benefits? | ||
| No | Do you support the 2010 temporary extension of tax relief? | ||
| I assume the question about 2010 extension refers to the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy. I only support tax incentives that are reasonably tied to the creation of family-supporting jobs - they must include accountability measures. Otherwise, I strongly oppose giveaways and subsidies to wealthy corporate special interests like big oil, one of the most profitable businesses in human history. Supply side tax incentives are an inefficient means of job creation; direct federal investment and increasing consumer demand are more effective. | |||
| No | Do you support requiring states to implement education reforms in order to be eligible for competitive federal grants? | ||
| Public schools should not be pitted against each other for scarce resources. A free, quality public education should be the birthright of every single child in this country. Our economy - our democracy - will not thrive if we do not recommit to the promise of great public education. We simply must marshal the resources to provide it for all kids. | |||
| No | Do you support reducing restrictions on offshore energy production? | ||
| We must reduce our overall dependence on oil, whether it comes from the middle east or the Gulf of Mexico. Making it easier for profit-driven corporations to suck every last drop of dinosaur fuels out of the earth is the worst way to meet our energy needs. Instead, we must become more efficient, conserve energy, and develop sustainable energy production, transport, and storage. This will not only be better for our environment, but will improve our national security, economy, and human health. | |||
| Yes | Do you believe that human activity is contributing to climate change? | ||
| Yes | Do you support the federal regulation of greenhouse gas emissions? | ||
| Climate scientists are clear: global climate change is not a "belief" - it is a fact. I support taxing carbon emissions for polluters to make sure that those who profit also pay their fair share towards repairing damage done to our environment and human health. Carbon pollution is a massive, market-distorting externality, and allowing large-scale polluters to socialize all the negative costs associated with their industries is not sustainable. The US must be a leader in combating climate change. | |||
| Yes | Do you support restrictions on the purchase and possession of guns? | ||
| While considering both the rights granted by the Second Amendment and the rich tradition of hunting and sportsmanship in Wisconsin, I must recognize that firearms are inherently dangerous. As the daughter of a law enforcement officer, I support greater accountability in the form of background checks, gun locks, closing the gun show loophole, and reinstating the assault weapons ban. We must be able to prevent violent criminals and mentally unstable individuals from misusing firearms and other weapons. | |||
| No | Do you support repealing the 2010 Affordable Care Act? | ||
| Yes | Should individuals be required to purchase health insurance, as mandated in the 2010 Affordable Care Act? | ||
| We have made great progress in reforming our broken health care system, and repealing the Affordable Care Act would have far-reaching negative effects: more than 30 million Americans would lose coverage and the deficit would increase the deficit by $109 billion, according to the CBO. The individual mandate is necessary to ensure that insurance companies cover everyone, regardless of "pre-existing conditions." I will work to build on the protections of the ACA to include a public option and ultimately a universal, single-payer health care system like Medicare-for-all. | |||
| No | Do you support requiring illegal immigrants to return to their country of origin before they are eligible for citizenship? | ||
| Yes | Do you support allowing illegal immigrants, who were brought to the United States as minors, to pursue citizenship without returning to their country of origin? | ||
| No | Do you support the enforcement of federal immigration law by state and local police? | ||
| Law-abiding immigrants should be given a clear path to citizenship. Mass deportation would have a very negative effect on our economy and communities. I applaud President Obama's executive order to suspend deportation for undocumented young people who came to the United States as children. Ultimately, though, we must pass comprehensive immigration reform that recognizes the fact that there are millions of law-abiding, taxpaying undocumented families living in virtually every community in this country. Local public safety resources should not go toward federal immigration enforcement. Conscripting local law enforcement agencies actually undermines public safety for citizens and undocumented people. | |||
| Yes | Do you support same-sex marriage? | ||
| I enthusiastically support marriage equality for same-sex couples, and have publicly advocated for it throughout my life. We must repeal the so-called Defense of Marriage Act, which is unconstitutional and morally abhorrent in its discrimination against same-sex couples. We must also repeal Wisconsin's ban on civil unions and marriage, which enshrined hatred and discrimination in our state constitution. Ensuring legal protections for all LGBTQ families is crucial. Partners deserve to have access to adoption and must be fully protected in the case of a family emergency. LGBT equality is a fundamental right, the civil rights issue of our time. | |||
| No | Do you support targeting suspected terrorists outside of official theaters of conflict? | ||
| No | Should the U.S use military force in order to prevent Iran from possessing a nuclear weapon? | ||
| While I do not support the use of military force in general, it is not responsible to take all military action completely "off the table" in dealing with a potentially nuclear Iran. Iran must not be allowed to obtain nuclear weapons, and the US must use every single tool at our disposal short of military action, working with international organizations and other nations, to prevent this. Using military force would be extremely risky and dangerous, and should be avoided at all costs. It must always be the very, very last resort. | |||
| No | Do you support allowing individuals to divert a portion of their Social Security taxes into personal retirement accounts? | ||
| We do not need to dramatically rewrite the rules of Social Security. By simply removing the cap on revenue from payroll taxes, we can ensure that Social Security remains solvent long into the future, through 2075 and beyond. | |||
SpendingIndicate what federal spending levels (#1-6) you support for the following general categories. Select one number per category; you can use a number more than once.TaxesIndicate what federal tax levels (#1-6) you support for the following general categories. Select one number per category; you can use a number more than once.
| Slightly Decrease | a) Agriculture | ||
| Slightly Increase | b) Arts | ||
| Greatly Decrease | c) Defense | ||
| Greatly Increase | d) Education | ||
| Greatly Increase | e) Environment | ||
| Greatly Decrease | f) Homeland Security | ||
| Slightly Increase | g) International aid | ||
| Greatly Increase | h) Medical Research | ||
| Greatly Increase | i) Scientific Research | ||
| Maintain Status | j) Space exploration | ||
| Slightly Increase | k) United Nations | ||
| Slightly Increase | l) Welfare | ||
| m) Other or expanded categories | |||
| Greatly Increase | a) Capital gains taxes | ||
| Slightly Increase | b) Corporate taxes | ||
| Maintain Status | c) Excise taxes (alcohol) | ||
| Maintain Status | d) Excise taxes (cigarettes) | ||
| Maintain Status | e) Excise taxes (transportation fuel) | ||
| Slightly Decrease | f) Income taxes (low-income families) | ||
| Maintain Status | g) Income taxes (middle-income families) | ||
| Greatly Increase | h) Income taxes (high-income families) | ||
| Greatly Increase | i) Inheritance taxes | ||
| Maintain Status | j) Payroll taxes | ||
| These basic descriptors are not sufficient to address the complicated factors involved in tax policy. For instance, the corporate tax rate is supposed to be 39%, but the effective tax rate (actually paid) is only about 23.5%. I'd like to lower the published rate for small businesses that pay their fair share but raise the amount actually paid by profitable multinational corporations that often pay little or no taxes. For detailed descriptions of my tax policies, please go to www.keldaforcongress.com/issues | |||
| 1. Create family-supporting jobs and shared prosperity 2. Expand public educational opportunities, including early childhood and higher education 3. Address climate change and sustainable energy/energy independence Also critically important are health care, campaign finance reform, and tax fairness. Please see my issues page, www.keldaforcongress.com/issues for a much more detailed discussion of my principles and priorities |
Vote Smart does not permit the use of its name or programs in any campaign activity, including advertising, debates, and speeches.